Why the movement to combat abortion is afraid of distance medication?

You need medical care, but the first available date is not for weeks. Even if you can wait, you still have a vacation at work, find children care and somehow to reach a clinic an hour away. America has some of the best medical expertise in the world, but access to this care like trying to solve the blindfolded cube.

The most extreme change that the epidemic brought to the United States’s health care system was to embrace a distance from medicine from a distance to provide virtual care. Remote medication relieves pressure on the system using technology to enable a doctor’s visit without navigating. This positive effect is particularly evident in reproductive health and expanding access to miscarriage.

However, abortion sponsorship through remote medical trees is being attacked as the administration responsible for the fall of the ROE V. Wade returns to power, and since cases are paid in conservative countries throughout the country seeking to prohibit drug abortion completely.

Anti -miscarriage extremists are exposed to threat through remote medicine because it allows you, the patient, to obtain the care you need. MidPristone and MIFEPRISTONE and MISOPROSTOL to end early pregnancy, now represents 63 per cent of miscarriage in the United States but despite its safety and effectiveness, conservative legislators are escalating.

Today one in every five is good for miscarriage, using a distance medicine to receive care. As the CEO of Hey Jane, a virtual abortion clinic that helped more than 75,000 patients reach care, I can tell you directly: Remote Training is not just stopping the epidemic. This is the key to enabling access to the broken health care system. This is why we should protect it from the last attacks by anti -abortion extremists.

It is very important to protect at a remote medicine as a way to reach a prescription medicine, including drug abortion. Health care is not only more suitable – it transforms how health care works on a basic level. Since its launch, my company has witnessed an overwhelming demand for pharmacological abortion through distance medication, and what we have learned has effects on the entire health care system.

This argument “nothing beats a person”? Our data shows that 98 percent of patients actually prefer inelitary communications, which means that they want health care management in their time, through messages and updates, instead of schedule their lives about reaching the doctor’s office. Privacy is another major factor, as nearly half of our patients refer to privacy is the most important for them during treatment. They want secret, fast and built around their lives.

For many patients, access to drug abortion on their conditions is to change life-especially in the states where personal clinics are few and far apart. Take Virginia, where 93 percent of the provinces have no personal abortion clinics, and the one that works with patients from the surrounding countries, which have some of the most restricted abortion laws in the country. Even in countries where abortion is legal and available, it may not be actually accessible.

Virtual abortion clinics are not just an alternative. They are often the only realistic option for patients who cannot spend a vacation day or lead hundreds of miles to the nearest clinic.

Termination of democracy in the field of health care in ways that we have not seen before. With a decrease in general costs, virtual clinics can provide more affordable care while removing exorbitant transportation costs often and caring for the child and missing wages for the patient.

The skeptics said that the Americans will not trust in the field of distance medication for important health care decisions, that technology was not ready, and that patients always prefer personal care. They were wrong in all charges. Now we must fight conservative extremists who are trying to choose what can be accessed via remote medical trees as a way to buy the bodies of pregnant women.

The future of the industry revolves around the use of technology to make healthy care for everyone. The battle around remote medicine, in its essence, is a battle on the possibility of access to drug abortion. Conservative extremists know that if they can cut access to these pills, they can effectively eliminate the preferred miscarriage of the majority of Americans – in every state. We cannot let it happen.

Tools here. Technology works. Patients want it. Elected officials must escalate and protect access to this basic health care.

Kiki Friedman is the founder and CEO of Hey Jane.