The Judicial Council in the House of Representatives, notes, Google, the mother company YouTube

On Thursday, the Chairman of the Judicial Committee in the House of Representatives, Jim Jordan (R-OHIO), called on the Gogle and YouTube parent company, asking the technology giant to hand over its contacts with the executive branch.

The committee also requested that Alphabet hand over internal contacts about its interactions with the previous administration and the third parties that work with the executive.

Jordan wrote in a letter to the CEO of Alphabet Sundar Pichai: “The supervision of the committee revealed that YouTube, a affiliate company for Alphabet, was a direct participation in the federal government control system.”

Jordan was martyred in the report of a committee that includes a series of emails between Google and the White House under the leadership of former President Biden about the moderate content in 2021, which is largely linked to the misinformation of Covid-19.

“To develop effective legislation, such as the potential legislation of the new legal limits on the ability of the executive authority to work with large technology to restrict the circulation of content users and users, the committee must first understand how and any of what is in the executive branch that has been forced and colluding with companies and other brokers in the oversight discourse.”

The CEO of Meta Mark Zuckerberg also noticed the recent criticism of the Biden Administration approach. Zuckerberg said in a letter to the House of Representatives Judicial Committee last August that he regretted the lack of a cashier than the pressure that his company faced to download the content related to Covid in 2021.

And Jordan said on Thursday: “She answered, as we knew, did not similarly remove the attempts of the Biden Harris administration to the censorship discourse,” Jordan said on Thursday.

“The technology company” will continue to show the committee how to impose our policies independently, rooted in our commitment to free expression. “

The Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the Biden administration contacts with technology companies last year. However, the judges did not reach the question of the first amendment in the heart of the case – whether the government’s contacts crossed the line to coercion – instead, finding the parties lacks to stand to bring the case.