In foreign policy, Trump must be more like Reagan, the least similar to Biden

The Biden administration was justified justified, including me, declaring the measures that were not willing to take in order to prevent or respond to the Russian aggression. President Biden’s fear and national security advisor had focused more on them on the potential measures by Vladimir Putin, if she faced, instead of Putin’s fear of what we might do if the Russian aggression continued.

In what was described by the Chairman of the Armed Services in the Senate Roger Weis.

Before negotiating the end of the war in Ukraine, or even determining who will sit on the table to reach a ceasefire, Higseth sent to the Kremlin what the Trump administration will not do. Foreign Minister Marco Rubio doubled after his meeting in Riyadh with his Russian counterpart, who is flowing on a geographical partnership between Moscow and Washington.

In the campaign, the Trump team often summoned “Salam Ronald Reagan” through power, stressing the importance of deterrence and that his absence led to fire with wars in Europe and the Middle East, preventing attention from the real threat from China.

However, how many Reagan lessons really understand the Trump’s National Security team and those in Congress? Do they realize the policies that have strengthened the economic, technological and military power to build prosperity at home and win the Cold War, precautions, and policies that defined the leadership of Reagan?

Rigan’s goal is convinced that the well -up to the updated US military would retract the aggression, and Reagan’s goal was to prevent war by making the conflict very expensive for opponents, supporting diplomacy and solid -power economic tools. He also understood that the uneducated aggression was provocative and would affect America unless we maintain US security obligations. On June 6, 1984, on the fortieth anniversary of Reagang Landgan announced:

“We have learned in America bitter lessons from two world wars: it is better to be ready here to protect peace, instead of taking the blind shelter across the sea, hasty to respond only after losing freedom. We have learned that isolation was never and will never be an acceptable response to the tyrant governments with intent Exposion.

Reagan’s words are sharply contrasting from the title of Higseth I to NATO in the defensive communication group in Ukraine; He said it is unlikely that Ukraine is a member of NATO and that the pre -war borders are no longer investigating. The notes that forced European countries to doubt America’s security obligations. President Trump doubled this, and Ukrainian President Voludmir Zelinski described “a dictator without elections” and said he had not started “war with Russia. Reagan was clear in distinguishing a partner from an evil empire.

Just as Washington cannot escape the results of the Russian aggression and should continue to support it to Ukraine, the war occurs in Europe and this must be done by our European allies. President Trump deserves to be credited with increasing the spending of defense of European allies. Under the leadership of Poland and the Baltic countries, these countries realize that Putin’s appetite comes with eating. In the 25th years that Putin’s ruled Russia, the continuous goal was to lead a wedge between Washington and our allies in NATO. We must work to ensure that he does not satisfy this desire.

In the Middle East, Ibrahim’s agreements, which were achieved during President Trump’s first term, were the first treaties to be negotiated between Israel and its Arab neighbors for decades. Even in light of this impressive achievement, the Gaza President’s plan – to turn the region into the Riviera in the Middle East and transfer its Palestinian population indicating intervention – gives one pause.

Reagan, like Trump, wanted to see stability coming to the Middle East. To help the 1983 ceasefire in Lebanon, the Reagan administration has published the naval infantry to separate the warriors. She tragicly, 241 was killed when their barracks were destroyed by a terrorist bomb, prompting Reagan to withdraw the remaining soldiers. Despite the peaceful intentions for people who have suffered from a lot of suffering, peace in the Middle East or American status has not been strengthened through this tragic episode.

The Trump administration is wise to give priority to the threat of China – which President Trump was the first to acknowledge. However, unlike his first term, this cannot be done to rule out the Russian aggression or the warring people from Tehran. Our commitment to NATO is not a weight that prevents movement towards addressing the threat from China, but rather one of the assets on the right side of the scale that enhances our ability to face the common challenge between China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.

Ending the massacre in Ukraine is the correct policy, which the Biden administration did at a very leisurely pace. However, achieving this is at the expense of the NATO alliance and countries most vulnerable to the Refresh Policy in Putin and for the Kremlin will only strengthen the axis of the affected.

The American leadership is crucial to our prosperity and a stable global system, which is what Ronald Reagan understood. He can also get to know a bad deal, and criticize the call for a negotiating treaty as the Carter Administration as “a weakness in the virtue suit.” President Trump must take advantage of the success of foreign policy in his first term and join Kiev and NATO to achieve a great beautiful deal that preserves the sovereignty of Ukraine and does not reward Russia and its partners.

David a. Merkel is a participant in LSE ideas and a distinguished colleague at Charleston College. He held the position of Deputy Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs for European and Calcular Affairs and the director of South and Central Asia in NSC.