RFK JR. Towards toxins the unification of Republicans and Democrats

With the Senate confirmation session in Robert F. Kennedy Junior is now scheduled this week, there is a lot of discussion about what Kennedy will do or the Minister of Health and Humanitarian Services in President Donald Trump’s administration will not do. Wide -scale estimates, but there is one lens through which Kennedy offers everything and shows how he will deal with the policies of the HHS secretary and beyond.

Kennedy is always in the elimination of toxins, this applies to everything. In an interview before the November elections, Kennedy talked about how the Democratic Party has been largely forgotten about toxins. It is not wrong. Democrats have multiplied greatly, betrayed the carbon and its quantitative appreciation. Their approach to nature has become just a problem with mathematics.

Kennedy suggests that the environmental movement has forgotten everything about toxins and chemicals for cancer and climbing cancer that infiltrate our heads, hearts, hormones and habitats. Looking at this lack of leadership between his former allies, Kennedy now wants his Republican colleagues in the Trump administration of toxins.

Regardless of those who lead this, both Republicans and Democrats will do well for Kennedy’s comments. Because this can be one of the most important general health opportunities in our lives-in addition to political lack of thinking. Public health and toxins framing here must be like a wide range of Americans who are determined as Republicans, Democrats and independents.

In fact, most Americans want to protect their bodies from toxins that have infiltrated their heads, hearts, hormones, habitats and chemicals forever that do not collapse in human or natural ecosystems. There is widespread support for the policy that protects and healthy Americans – and it is not surprising, because chemicals appear in every part of our bodies. A recent study showed that among 14,000 chemicals known in food packages, more than 3,600 have been discovered in the human body.

Regulating exposure to things like plastic, and therefore, is a very common and sad issue. Eight in 10 Americans support a national policy that reduces one -use plastic materials, and about nine in every 10 people prefer global rules that prohibit plastic.

These numbers are not surprising because the problem is widespread. The exact plastic is found in our brains at more than seven to 30 times of plastic in other organs. One study has shown a 50 percent increase in the past eight years, which is terrifying. Microleum plastic is also found in our hearts and blood, which increases the risk of heart attack, stroke and early death. They appear in our reproductive organs, creating fertility problems for men and losing pregnancy for women.

Nothing is explicit about carbon or climate, which is now partisan topics, unfortunately. This does not mean that we must drop the carbon concentration, because it is linked. Plastic fossil fuel companies and petrochemicals are the backup plan after moving to renewable energy.

However, all this removal of toxins is mature to political capture. This means that we need to diversify party platforms and talk points. Since Kennedy is right that when it comes to removing toxins from our bodies and ecological systems, there is a real opportunity for driving.

There are many Americans who do not want toxins in their heads, hearts, hormones or habitats. They are looking for leadership, and to get a few parties at this increasing moment.

If Kennedy and Trump’s administration are committed to making America healthy again, then a serious approach protects us from exposure to the permissible toxins will be a next natural step. The Americans want it, and it is time for a long time for the Republicans to lead this.

Michael Shank, PhD, is the assistant teaching staff at the World Affairs Center at New York University and a visiting researcher at Carter School at George Mason for Peace and Conflict Resolution.