The Senate prohibits the decision of the Iranian war authorities

The Senate prevented an effort on Friday to prevent President Trump from taking future military measures against Iran without the permission of Congress, less than a week after directing strikes targeting the country’s nuclear capabilities.

Senate members voted 47-53 to a large extent on party lines against the decision of the war authorities.

Senator Rand Ball (R-Ky) was the only legislator of the Republican Party to vote with Democrats. Senator John Vitirman (D-PA), who is an enthusiastic supporter of Israel, voted with the Republicans.

Fifty -one votes needed to pass.

The decision was composed by Senator Tim Kane (D-VA), which has long been supportive of Congress affirms himself on the expenses of the Green War.

“I think this week’s events have proven that the war is very large so that it cannot be transferred to the decisions of any one,” Kane said on the ground before Friday.

The vote came days after the complaints of Democrats on the issue of Iran.

Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (DN.Y.) reported that the administration officials had contacted him early that the strikes occurred, but they refused to inform him of a place or reveal any other information.

Democrats also questioned the validity of Trump’s claim that Iranian nuclear sites targeted “completely destroyed”. This was especially the case after a first classification report indicated that the strikes did not destroy the basic components of the Iranian nuclear program, and it is likely to restore them only within months. The most modern statements from the CIA and the head of the National Intelligence Trump were opposed to this report.

These questions were still unanswered after the major administration officials – including the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, John Ratcliffe, and the head of the subscribers, Dan Kane – held a secret briefing for members on Thursday.

While the legislators seemed satisfied with the answers they received, they were still not sure of the amount of relapse that will prove that the strikes are for Thraan.

“The point is: We do not know,” said Senator Richard Blumental (D-CONN) after briefing. “Anyone says that we know with certainty is to make it increase because we do not have a final evaluation of the damage of the battle.”

“Certainly, this task was as successful as it was widely destroyed, and may have been severely damaged and the Iranian nuclear weapons program declined. But for how long and the rest of the intelligence community itself, he added.

More Republicans in Congress were expected to jump on the war forces, but some retreated after Trump announced the ceasefire between Israel and Iran on Monday, which has withstood in recent days.

Representative Thomas Massi (R-Ky), who found himself in a long spit with the administration on strikes and the party tax package, withdrew his support for the decision of the war authorities he presented with Representative Rut Khanna (California).

Nevertheless, Trump told reporters on Friday that he would not hesitate to agree to more strikes against Iran if the intelligence community gathered information in the coming months and years about the capabilities of enriching uranium in the country.

“Certainly, without a question, certainly,” Trump said at a news conference when asked if a second wave of bombings was possible.

The lion’s share of Republicans gave the administration full support.

“President Trump protects our country,” said the majority of the Senate John Paraso on the floor earlier on Friday, pointing to similar strikes during the period of former President Obama that did not require Congress permission.

He did so [responsibly]Pararasu said: “He did it decisively, and he did this constitutionally,” Pararasu said. [this resolution] There is no need. … will prevent the president from protecting us in the future. “