Trump may be stuck with Biden’s financing priorities for a longer period than the Republican Party hoped

President Trump can be stuck with the priorities of spending specified in the framework of the Biden administration for a longer period of Republican in Congress.

While the Congress is struggling to conclude a governmental financing deal from the two parties, the hopes of the beating fade at the time of closing on March 14. Some legislators say that the Stopgap measures to be the most likely way to maintain government financing, especially since Congress also faces a final date on April 30 to prevent automatic financing discounts.

The Chairman of the Credit Committee in the House of Representatives Tom Cole (R-OKLA) said this week that the appetite is “growing” to obtain Stopgap financing, also known as the ongoing decision (CR), which will continue until September, where legislators run after months of completion of special financing bills In the fiscal year 2025.

“This is one of the things that worries you,” Cole told reporters this week. “I would like to say that there is a large part of the Congress that only prefers us until we get Trump’s things.”

Cole says that they are still and the allocations are dragging discussions from the two parties in the hope of concluding a deal on a higher financial financing number 2025, which will start working towards the settlement bills that can pass both rooms.

But tensions reach a temperature in Washington, amid Trump’s financing, freezing his efforts to dismantle agencies, which holds two -party financing talks with strong opposition to the latest work of the president.

Council Mike Johnson (R-La) referred to the fingers of the Democrats early on Friday, indicating that the Democrats “are trying to create a kind of government closure”, while referring to the recent comments by the minority leader in the House of Representatives, Hakim Jeffrez (DN .) And other Democrats.

Johnson said on Friday: “We were negotiating in good faith and trying to get the top line number,” Johnson said on Friday. “But, as far as I know, they were somewhat not responding during the past two days or so. Therefore, I hope we can return to it. We need to accomplish this task.”

Democrats have fought hard on Johnson’s comments.

“He just needs the right information,” said Representative Rosa Deloro (Kun), adding, “There are offers on the table.”

Johnson’s comments come after Jeffrez said that the Democrats will look forward to the deadline for funding on March 14 “if not urgent” to face Trump’s efforts to target the financial assistance that Congress has already allocated.

Jeffrez’s observations reached the wake of a comprehensive cessation of a comprehensive financing from the administration office and the budget order that has been considered since then in the courts.

Since then, the memo has been canceled, but there is lack of confidence among the Democrats that any agreement dealing with the Republicans will remain on it, as the White House said that Trump’s executive orders stop money for climate laws and infrastructure for the agenda of former President Biden, another financing, and another financing , It is still valid.

During a press conference earlier this week, Deloro was pressured on whether Democrats are looking to obtain guarantees that protect the agencies targeted by Trump, such as the United States International Development Agency (the United States Agency for International Development), which is reflected in the legislation of the two -party financing.

“We look at the language we need to do to prevent them from her heart,” she said on Wednesday.

There is still a lot of uncertainty about any of Trump’s orders that will have attached power, because some may manipulate the courts.

Some Republicans are still negotiating to enact new more -fly financing legislation with Trump’s orders.

“I hope we will change some funding and policy related to the estimated spending, and I hope to do something that is compatible with President Trump’s executive orders,” said MP Warren Davidson.

“If we do CR, I think we must go in the short term, but perfectly, the estimated budget lines with the president’s policies. Davidson told The Hill:” He has already taken action. “We should not leave it suspended in the courts.”

However, the other Republicans have indicated an openness to the idea of ​​CR for the whole year if this helps to maintain funding.

“CRS is not my favorite car, but the idea that we will get it [appropriations bills] It was done by March 14 very low. “If we can do so, I am for that,” said MP CH-TEXAS on Friday.

“Now, again, CR is still the US Agency for International Development’s financing is not an excited thing,” he said. But if we are able to control the spending from the executive branch on these things, if Ross can enter there, then the participation in what may need to be done, reservation, and return dollars to these types of things that we believe are related, then CR has a great meaning. “

Congress stare at the deadline in late April to pass the entire year financing legislation, or risk automatic discounts of government programs under the spending limit by Biden and the leadership of the Republican Party for nearly two years.

Cole said that Stopgap to keep the government funded from other levels of retail under Biden’s supervision will not lead to discounts.

“I was told that as long [passed] “Bells”, but he also told the correspondents that he was “more anxious now on March 14,” said Bills, but he also told the correspondents that he was “more anxious now on March 14.”

Meanwhile, Republicans in the Senate are planning plans by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, Lindsey Graham (RS.C.) on Friday to disturb by financing legislation to pay Trump’s priorities on the border and defense without democratic support in the upper chamber.

While Bobby Kojan, a former democratic budget assistant in the Senate and chief director of the federal budget policy at the American Progress Center, said that some financing may not undergo Congress spending covers, and on Friday indicated that the legislative batch could have an impact on financing talks.

“You can imagine a scenario as they negotiated to freeze defense and freezing in a non -defense, then he says:” Oh, but I give an additional 37.5 billion dollars to defend by reconciliation. “This is what they suffer there.”

Graham’s plan is seeking to provide a batch of $ 150 billion for national defense.

Cole has been pressed on whether such a package can help Republicans pass a year stopping with increased money for areas such as migration and defense on the side.

“This is definitely possible,” Cole told Hill on Friday. “I heard that speculation, but again, I got more than Grace’s saying in this room.”