Trump’s IVF Order: Democrats have complained of ‘PR stunt’ as a bridge of anti -abortion groups

Democratic lawmakers decree the recent orders on the recent order of President Donald Trump as “PR stunt” about Vitro Nidhek, while the anti -abortion groups have jumped with a step that followed the promise of Trump’s promotion.

Trump has issued an executive order on Tuesday to protect the president’s assistant to protect the IVF access for domestic policy and to give a list of policy recommendations to reduce the cost of “offensively” process for the “offensively” process.

The Democrats urged him to do more, probably wanted to call his bluff.

“If he is truly serious about taking the promise to free IVF for everyone is to be truly serious then he can prove that he can prove that he can call my back with the Senate Republicans with IVF is the right to law This will require insurance plan to cover IVF, “Senator Tamie Duckworth (D-El.) Said in a statement.

“Otherwise, all of it is all a familiar liar from a lip-to-be” “

Duckworth has worked to create a protection for the treatment that he had to imagine his two daughters after fighting infertility for more than a decade. The IVF Senator re -introduced the rights of IVF Act with Democratic Sense last year. Corey Booker (NJ) and Patty Murray (Wash). It tried to create a statutory right for Americans’ vitro fertilization and other fertility treatment access.

The Senate Republicans again blocked the bill and called it a stunt of the election year by the Democrats, some provide alternative laws. A bill of Florida Sen tried to extend health savings accounts to make the funds to make funds for IVF.

Murray has publicly criticized Trump for his IVF order, which he called empty gestures.

“Let’s become clear: This PR stunt actually does nothing to expand access to IVF. Republicans have made this mess by reversing and they have blocked the law multiple times that will make IVF care more accessible and affordable for the family. Let me break, “He wrote in a post on social media platform X.

Members of the Congressional Breeding Freedom Caucas on Wednesday argued that Trump could make his promise to fertility treatment by instructing federal agencies to expand the IVF coverage of employees, senior or service members. According to a statement published by the Coccas Co-Chair, he could also prove his promise by requesting House Speaker Mike Johnson and the then-Cinenet Majority Leader Chak Shumar to pass the rights of IVF Act last year.

“Donald Trump is not serious about protecting their rights to build their terms,” ​​writes representative Diana Dyageet (D-Kolo.) And Mirna Press (D-Mas). “Yesterday’s inaction doesn’t change it.”

However, anti-abortion lawyers against IVF have argued in favor of Trump-away from widening access to the rules.

During the IVF, physicians feed an egg with sperm in a lab to create a human embryo, which is later selected to the mother’s uterus. Physicians will often recover multiple eggs from the ovary to prepare IVF and create multiple fetuses by making multiple fetuses, which will result in the transfer of pregnancy to increase adversity.

The embryos that are never used then are stored, donated or destroyed.

Some anti -abortion lawyers, who believe that life begins, oppose IVF because the process can involve the destruction of the unused fetus.

Life of America leader Christian Hawkins advised Trump for his IVF order before he signed Trump.

“The rumor is that President Trump is ready to publish something about IVF funds … please stop the IVF industry, which persuade the frustrating families, kills people at the fetal level and promotes the eugenics,” the X post on Tuesday morning.

Liala Rose, president of Life Pro-Advocacy Group Live Action, also accepted Trump’s order, arguing that IVF’s treatment was “not a biographical” in X’s post.

The leadership of an abortion anti-group-Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life had a further refugee response to the American-Trump order, advising the fetal destruction by urging his administration to do more.

A statement issued on Tuesday states “SBA’s pro-life America is not in line with the treatment of moral fertility with the treatment of moral fertility, which helps couples fighting infertility,” said a statement issued on Tuesday. “We also believe that human embryos should not be destroyed. Misconduct practitioners who switch human embryos, fail to follow the basic protection standards, or neglect the desired human embryo by couples and destroy the account under any federal role in the treatment of fertility. “

The group also says they are hoping that the administration will consider at least health and security warnings that couples are trying for pregnancy to make affordable recommendations when they are trying to get pregnant and for the fetus.